Image processing apparatus, image processing method, and storage medium

ABSTRACT

A non-local means method is insufficient in its noise reduction effect or edge retainability due to a perfect match between blocks in a case where a reference pixel matches a target pixel. Therefore, information on a target region and plural reference regions is obtained for the target pixel. Whether the target region matches any one of the reference regions is determined from the obtained information. Switching between weight derivation methods based on similarity between the target region and the reference region is performed according to a determined result.

BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION

1. Field of the Invention

The present invention relates to an image processing apparatus, an imageprocessing method and a storage medium for reducing noise in image dataof a captured image.

2. Description of the Related Art

There is a demand that a camera have higher sensitivity than hitherto inorder to capture an image of a darker scene or a faster object. However,an increase in the sensitivity of the camera causes an increase innoise, and therefore, noise reduction processing for more greatlyreducing the noise becomes necessary. Simple noise reduction processingcauses a deterioration in resolution, and therefore, a technology forreducing noise while retaining an edge or a texture is necessary. Ageneral approach for such a noise reduction technology of retaining theedge involves determining similarity between a target pixel, to bereduced in noise and a reference pixel around the target pixel,determining a weight according so the similarity, and calculating aweighted mean, thereby reducing noise. For example, a technology calledbilateral filtering determines a weight according to the similaritycalculated based on a difference in pixel value between the target pixeland the reference pixel and a distance between the target pixel and thereference pixel on an image. (Refer to “Bilateral Filtering for Gray andColor Images,” Proc. IEEE Int. Conf. on Computer Version, pp. 836-846(1998). Also, a technology called a non-local means method known asnoise reduction processing with higher accuracy uses block matching tocalculate the similarity between the target pixel and the referencepixel. (Refer to “A non-local algorithm for image denoising,” IEEEComputer Vision and Pattern Recognition, 2005, Vol. 2, pp. 60-65(2005)).

However, the non-local means method has an insufficient noise reductioneffect due to the fact that a complete block match occurs in a casewhere the same region as chat for a target pixel is set as for areference pixel.

SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

According to one aspect of the present invention, there is provided animage processing apparatus for determining a pixel value of a targetpixel by a weighted mean of plural reference pixels in image data,including: a derivation unit configured to derive a weight for each ofthe reference pixels, based on similarity between a target regionassociated with the target pixel, and a reference region associated withthe reference and a weighted mean processing unit configured to performweighted mean processing based on pixel values of the plural referencepixels and the weights corresponding to the reference pixels,respectively, derived by the derivation unit, in which the weighted meanprocessing unit performs the weighted mean processing by using a pixelother than the target pixel, as the reference pixel.

Further features of the present invention will become apparent from thefollowing description of exemplary embodiments (with reference to theattached drawings).

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

FIG. 1 is a block diagram illustrating a configuration of an imageprocessing apparatus;

FIG. 2 is a representation of assistance in explaining relationshipsamong a target pixel, a target region, a reference pixel, and areference region;

FIG. 3 is a graph illustrating an example of a probability distributionfollowed by a value obtained by dividing the sum of squares of adifference between the target region and the reference region by doublea noise variance;

FIG. 4 is a block diagram of an image processing apparatus according toa first embodiment;

FIG. 5 is a flowchart, illustrating a flow of processing of the firstembodiment;

FIGS. 6A to 6C illustrate examples of functions for transformingsimilarity into a weight, used in a second embodiment;

FIG. 7 is a block diagram of an image processing apparatus according nothe second embodiment;

FIG. 8 is a flowchart, illustrating a flow of processing of the secondembodiment;

FIG. 9 is a block diagram of an image processing apparatus according toa third embodiment;

FIG. 10 is a flowchart illustrating a flow of processing of the thirdembodiment;

FIG. 11 is a block diagram of an image processing apparatus according toa fourth embodiment; and

FIG. 12 is a flowchart illustrating a flow of processing of the fourthembodiment.

DESCRIPTION OF THE EMBODIMENTS

Embodiments of the present invention will be described below withreference to the drawings. Incidentally, it is to be understood thatconfigurations of the following embodiments are illustrative only, andthe present invention is not limited to illustrated configurations

First Embodiment

A configuration of an image processing apparatus according to a firstembodiment will be described with reference to FIG. 1.

In FIG. 1, the image processing apparatus includes a CPU (centralprocessing unit) 101, RAM (random access memory) 102, an HDD (hard diskdrive) 103, a general-purpose interface (I/F) 104, a monitor 108, and amain bus 109. The general-purpose I/F connects to an image capturedevice 105 such as a camera, an input device 106 such as a mouse or akeyboard, and an external memory 107 such as a memory card to the mainbus 109.

Description will be given below with regard to various types ofprocessing; implemented by the CPU 101 executing various pieces ofsoftware (or computer programs) stored in the HDD 103.

First, the CPU 101 starts an image processing application stored in theHDD 103, and loads the image processing application into the RAM 102 anddisplays a user interface (UI) on the monitor 108. Then, various datastored in the HDD 103 or the external memory 107, image data captured bythe image capture device 105, a command from the input device 106, andthe like are transferred to the RAM 102. Further, various operations areperformed on data stored in the RAM 102 based on a command from the CPU101 in accordance with processing in the image processing application.Results of the operations are displayed on the monitor 108 or stored inthe HDD 103 or the external memory 107.

Description will be given with regard to details of processing in theabove-described configuration, in which image data as a target of noisereduction is inputted to the image processing application to performnoise reduction processing. Firstly, description will be given withregard to processing by a non-local means method as the conventionaltechnology. After that, mention will be made of a problem involved inprocessing in a case where a reference pixel matches a target pixel,noted in the first embodiment. Then, description will be given withregard to an approach for solving the problem.

Description of Non-Local Means Method

Image data of a captured image contains a signal component as anoriginal, value without noise, and a noise component added to she signalcomponent ideal noise reduction processing is to calculate a mean ofpixel values of pixels having the same signal component. Thereby, imagedata, in which the noise component is reduced due to a reduction ofstandard deviation of the noise component while the signal component isremained as it is, is obtained. However, the image data obtained by theimage capture has noise, and therefore, which pixels have the sameoriginal signal component cannot be accurately seen. However, processingclose to the calculation of the mean of the pixel values of the pixelshaving the same signal component can be accomplished by selecting alikely pixel based on some similarity and calculating a mean, or byassigning a weight to the calculation of the mean according to thesimilarity. Therefore, processing for calculating a weighted mean is ageneral form of the noise reduction processing in image processing.Hereinafter, a pixel of interest to be reduced in noise will be called atarget pixel, and plural pixels to be used for mean calculation will becalled reference pixels this time, an equation for the weighted mean isas follows.

$\begin{matrix}{I_{i,{new}} = {\sum\limits_{j}^{Nr}{w_{ij}{I_{j}/{\sum\limits_{j}^{Nr}w_{ij}}}}}} & (1)\end{matrix}$

Here, Nr denotes the number of reference pixels. I_(i,new) in the leftside denotes the pixel value of the ith target pixel after the noisereduction processing. Σ means calculation of the sum, of Nr summands,w_(ij)I_(j) or w_(ij), where j are indices j which identify pluralreference pixels, I_(j) denotes the pixel value of the jth referencepixel, and w_(ij) denotes the weight of the jth reference pixel for theith target pixel. A denominator is used for normalization such that thesum of weights becomes equal to 1. The non-local means method adoptsblock matching for calculation of the similarity between the targetpixel and the reference pixel. Specifically, as illustrated in FIG. 2, aregion around the target pixel is first defined as a target region, andlikewise, a region around each reference pixel is defined as a referenceregion. At this time, it is not necessarily required that the targetregion contain the target pixel, and it is not necessarily required thateach reference region contain each reference pixel. Regions having thesame size are prepared for the target region and the reference region.Then, a square of a difference between each pixel which forms the targetregion and each pixel which forms the reference region corresponding toeach pixel of the target region is calculated. The sum of the squares ofthe difference is calculated for all pixels which form the targetregion. The sum of the squares of the difference is an index of thesimilarity between the target pixel, and the reference pixel. Thesimilarity is higher as the sum of the squares of the difference iscloser to 0, while on the other hand, the similarity is lower as the sumof the squares of the difference is larger. Then, the sum of the squaresof the difference is transformed into the weight w_(ij). An equation fortransformation is as follows.

$\begin{matrix}{w_{ij} = {\exp\left( {- \frac{\sum\limits_{k}^{N_{b}}{\alpha_{k}\left( {I_{ik} - I_{jk}} \right)}^{2}}{h^{2}}} \right)}} & (2)\end{matrix}$

I_(ik) denotes the pixel value of the kth pixel which forms the targetregion, and I_(jk) denotes the pixel value of the kth pixel which formsthe jth reference region. α_(k) denotes a constant having a valuedetermined for the kth pixel of the target region. N_(b) denotes thenumber of pixels which form the target region (hereinafter called thenumber of target region pixels). Incidentally, the number of pixelswhich form the reference region is the same as the number of targetregion pixels. h denotes a parameter, which has the role of adjustingthe intensity of noise reduction. Incidentally, the name “non-localmeans” is given because a range of the reference pixels is setthroughout the entire image, not in a local region of the image.However, it is not essential for noise reduction that the range of thereference pixels be set throughout the entire image, and a noisereduction effect is obtained even if the reference pixels are limited tothe local region of the image. Also, the range as the reference pixelscontains the target pixel because it is natural that a value after thenoise reduction processing reflects the value of the target pixelitself. The conventional technology performs processing according to theabove equation, even in a case where the reference pixel matches thetarget pixel.

Problems Inherent in Non-Local Means Method

Next, description will be given with regard to problems of the non-localmeans method to be solved, by the first embodiment. As mentioned above,the non-local means method uses the block matching between a targetregion and a reference region to calculate the similarity between thetarget pixel in the target region and the reference pixel in thereference region. This is based on the assumption that the signalcomponent of the target pixel is the same as the signal component of thereference pixel in a case where the pixel value of each of pixels in thetarget region is almost the same as the pixel value of each of pixels inthe reference region. However, even in a case where the signal componentof the target region is the same as the signal component of a certainreference region A, a situation where the pixel value of each of pixelsin the target region is almost the same as the pixel value of each ofpixels in the reference region is statistically rare. For example, evenin a case of a smooth region where the signal components of pixels inthe target region and the signal components of pixels in the referenceregion A are the same color, the similarity between the target regionand the reference region A is not so high due to a noise component.Meanwhile, in a case where a reference region B which is the same regionas the target region (or equivalently, the target region itself) is usedas the reference region, the same region is used to compares pixels, andthus, the pixel values of pixels in the target region and the pixelvalues of pixels in the reference region B completely match each other.The non-local means method assigns a high weight to reference pixelswhich form a reference region having high similarity, and thus, anextremely high weight is assigned to a reference pixel B′ (orequivalently, she target pixel itself) which forms the reference regionB. Meanwhile, although a reference pixel A′ which forms the referenceregion A having the same signal component has relatively highsimilarity, the reference pixel A′ is given a lower weight, as comparedto the reference pixel B′ (or equivalently, the target pixel itself)which forms the reference region B. After all, the weight of the pixelof the target pixel itself is relatively higher than the weight of otherreference pixels, and thus, a sufficient noise reduction effect cannotbe achieved.

The contents of the above description will be described in more detail.Firstly, description will be given with regard to statistical behaviorof the sum of the squares of the difference in a case where pixels of atarget region and pixels of a reference region are identical in signalcomponent. The sum of the squares of the difference is used assimilarity between the target region and the reference region, andcorresponds to a weight for reference pixels which form the referenceregion. Incidentally, the presence or absence of α_(k) is not involvedin the essence of a problem to be described below. Hereinafter,therefore, α_(k) is all assumed to be 1 in order to facilitatedescription.

First, the signal component of the target region is represented asS_(ik), and the noise component thereof is represented as N_(ik). Thepixel value I_(ik) of kth pixel in the target region is the sum of thesignal component S_(ik) and the noise component N_(ik). Likewise, thesignal component of the jth reference region is represented as S_(jk),and the noise component thereof is represented as N_(jk). In a casewhere the signal component of the target region is the same as thesignal component of the reference region (S_(ik)=S_(jk)), the sum of thesquares of the difference D_(ij) is the sum of the squares of thedifference between the noise components.

$\begin{matrix}{D_{ij} = {{\sum\limits_{k}^{N_{b}}\left( {I_{ik} - I_{jk}} \right)^{2}} = {\sum\limits_{k}^{N_{b}}\left( {N_{ik} - N_{jk}} \right)^{2}}}} & (3)\end{matrix}$

The sum of the squares of the difference D_(1j) in the case of the samesignal component as described above, or equivalently, the sum of thesquares of the difference between the noise component is 0 in a casewhere the target region and the reference region are set as the sameregion. However, in a general case, or equivalently, in a case where thetarget region and the reference region are not set as the same region, aprobability that the sum of the squares of the difference between thenoise components is 0 is rare. Description will be given below.

Assuming that a noise distribution is a Gaussian distribution and astandard deviation is σ, it is known that an amount χ_(ij) obtained bydividing the sum of the squares of the difference D_(ij) by double anoise variance σ² follows a chi (χ) square distribution, the degree offreedom of which is the number N_(b) of target region pixels. A χ squaredistribution P(x|N_(b)) is expressed by Equation (4).

$\begin{matrix}{{P\left( x \middle| N_{b} \right)} = \frac{x^{{\lbrack{N_{b}/2}\rbrack} - 1}{\exp \left( {{- x}/2} \right)}}{2^{N_{b}/2}{\Gamma \left( {N_{b}/2} \right)}}} & (4)\end{matrix}$

FIG. 3 illustrates the outlines of the chi square distributions in acase where the number N_(b) of target region pixels is 1 and in a casewhere the number N_(b) of target region pixels is 9. As illustrated inFIG. 3, in a case where the number N_(b) of target region pixels is 1,the likeliest value, or equivalently, the most frequent value, of thesum of the squares of the difference, is 0; however, in a case where thenumber N_(b) of target region pixels is 9, the most frequent value is 7,and an event in which the sum of the squares of the difference is 0 is arare phenomenon. In the chi square distribution, an event in which thesum of the squares of the difference is 0 is a rarer phenomenon as thenumber of target region pixels as the degree of freedom increases.Incidentally, a tendency that the event in which the sum of the squaresof the difference is 0 is rarer as the number N_(b) of target regionpixels increases substantially holds also for a noise distribution otherthan the Gaussian distribution. This is a dimensional effect, and is dueto the fact that a probability that plural pairs of pixels have the samevalue at the same time decreases exponentially with respect to thenumber of pixels as the number of pairs of pixels for differencecalculation increases. In other words, this indicates that, in the caseof the target pixel and the reference pixel having the same signalcomponent, a match between the noise component of the target region andthe noise component of the reference region is rare. Meanwhile, in theconventional non-local, means method, in a case where the signalcomponent of the target pixel matches the signal component of thereference pixel, a phenomenon which is to be a rare phenomenon in whichthe noise components also match each other always occurs. One concept ofthe first embodiment is that a weight for such an inherently rarephenomenon (or an event in which the noise component of the targetregion matches the noise component of the reference region) is broughtclose to a probable weight.

Now, in the conventional non-local means method, in a case where thereference region and the target region are set as the same region, thesum of the squares of the difference D_(ij) is always 0. Thus, in a casewhere the target pixel itself is set as the reference pixel, a weightfor the reference pixel is always 1 according to Equation (2).Meanwhile, in a case where anything other than the target pixel is setas the reference pixel, even if the signal components of the referencepixel and the target pixel are the same, an event in which the weight is1 is very rare, and an expected value of the weight, which is a typicalvalue, is considerably smaller than 1. An expected value W of the weightis calculated as given below. P(x|N_(b)) is a probability distributionfunction of the sum of the squares of the difference x in a case wherethe target region has N_(b) pixels and in a case where the signalcomponents are the same.

$\begin{matrix}{W = {\int_{0}^{\infty}{{\exp \left( {- \frac{x}{h^{2}/\left\lbrack {2\sigma^{2}} \right\rbrack}} \right)}{P\left( x \middle| N_{b} \right)}{x}}}} & (5)\end{matrix}$

For example, in a case where the number N_(b) of target region pixels is9, the expected value of the weight is about 0.16 in a case where theparameter h is double the standard deviation σ. Likewise, in a casewhere the number N_(b) of target region pixels is 25 and the parameter his 2σ, the expected value of the weight is about 0.0063. As describedabove, if the weight is derived based on Equation (2), the weight forthe pixel value of the target pixel itself has an overwhelmingly largervalue than the weights for the pixel values of other reference pixels.Thus, even if a weighted mean is calculated for an smooth image formedof a uniform signal component and noise component, the weight for thepixel value of the target pixel itself is overwhelmingly large, andthus, substantially the same value as the value of the target pixelitself is obtained. As a result, sufficient noise reduction is notperformed on the target pixel. This effect becomes more remarkable asthe number N_(b) of pixels of the target region becomes larger, and theeffect becomes serious if the target region is larger than 4×4 blocks(N_(b)=16).

Meanwhile, in a case where the parameter h is considerably larger thanthe standard deviation σ of noise, the weight calculated based onEquation (2) is slightly smaller than 1. For example in a case whereh=5σ, the expected values of the weights are about 0.71 and about 0.38in. a case where N_(b)=9 and in a case where N_(b)=25, respectively.Thus, if the parameter h is large, a weighted mean is calculated byusing a weight such that the pixel value of the reference pixel, issmaller than 3 times the pixel value of the target pixel, specificallysuch that, in a case where N_(b)=9, the pixel value of the referencepixel is about 1.4 times the pixel value of the target pixel, or suchthat, in a case where N_(b)=25, the pixel value of the reference pixelis about 2.6 times the pixel value of the target pixel. If a ratiobetween the weight for the target pixel and the weight for the referencepixel is set to this extent, noise of the target pixel is reduced by theweighted mean. However, the setting of the parameter h to a large valuemeans that the sum of the squares of the difference, even if having alarge value, is used to calculate a mean value. In other words, thismeans that the sum, of the squares of the difference is used tocalculate the mean even in a case where the signal components of thetarget pixel and the reference pixel do not statistically significantlymatch each other, and as a result, a blurred image appears. In order toobtain a noise-reduced image with little blur, the weight for thereference pixel whose signal component does not statisticallysignificantly match the signal component of the target pixel is requiredto have a sufficiently smaller value than the weight for the referencepixel whose signal component statistically significantly matches thesignal component of the target pixel.

Whether or not the signal components statistically significantly matcheach other can be determined by the value of χ_(ij). Specifically, avalue χ_(th) which satisfies Equation (6) is determined, and, in a casewhere χ_(ij) is larger than the value χ_(th), a determination is madethat the signal component of each of pixels in the reference region doesnot match the signal component of each of pixels in the target region.

1−∫₀ ^(χ) ^(th) dxP(x|N _(b))=ε  (6)

Here, ε denotes a significance level in a case where a null hypothesisthat the signal component of each of the pixels in the reference regionmatches the signal component of each of the pixels in the target regionis rejected. For example, ε is set equal to 0.001 (ε=0.001). The leftside of Equation (6) represents a probability that χ_(ij) exceeds χ_(th)in a case where the signal component of each of the pixels in thereference region matches the signal component of each of the pixels inthe target region. In other words, a determination is made that thesignal components do not match each other, in a case where theprobability that χ_(ij) exceeds χ_(th) in a case where the signalcomponent of each of the pixels in the reference region matches thesignal component of each of the pixels in the target region is equal toor less than 1/1000. Then, in order to prevent an image after noisereduction from becoming blurred, the weight for χ_(ij) for which adetermination is made that the signal components do not match eachother, or the sum, of the squares of the difference D_(ij) correspondingto χ_(ij) should be equal to or less than at least 1/25 of the expectedvalue W of the weight in a case where the signal components match eachother. More preferably, the weight is equal to or less than about 1/100of the expected value W. An investigation as to the value of the weightfor χ_(ij) for which a determination is made that the signal componentsdo not match each other shows that, in a case where h=5σ, the weightsare about 0.11 and about 0.015 in a case where N_(b)=9 and in a casewhere N_(b)=25, respectively. These values are not so small as comparedto the expected values, 0.71 and 0.38, of de weight, and thus, asomewhat blurred image appears.

Incidentally, a detailed investigation shows that, only in a case whereN_(b) is equal to or less than 16, even with the conventional non-localmeans method, the parameter h which satisfies a condition as given belowis present; specifically, the weight for the target pixel is 3 or lesstimes the expected value of the weight, and the weight for the pixelwhose signal component does not match is equal to or less than 1/100 ofthe expected value. However, the range of the parameter h whichsatisfies the condition is narrow, and the degree of freedom of imagequality adjustment is low. Also, if the value of N_(b) is set small, aproblem arises as given below; specifically, a degradation in imagequality occurs due to another cause such as the fact that alow-frequency component of noise is difficult to fall, and it is notnecessarily possible to freely set N_(b) to a small value. After all,the conventional non-local means method has the problem of havingdifficulty in obtaining an image which achieves both noise reduction andretention of an edge or a texture.

Details of First Embodiment

As mentioned above, in the conventional non-local means method, theweight for the reference pixel derived in a case where the same regionas the target region is set as the reference region (in this case, thetarget pixel is the reference pixel) is not statistically likely.Therefore, it is difficult to obtain an image which achieves both noisereduction and edge retention. In the first embodiment, the weight in acase where the same region as the target region is set as the referenceregion, or equivalently, in a case where the reference pixel is thetarget pixel itself, is set relatively smaller than hitherto thereby tosolve this problem. Here, use of the term “relatively” is for thepurpose of providing a weighted mean having a degree of freedom suchthat results remain unchanged even if all weights are multiplied by aconstant factor. The essence of the first embodiment is that a relativedifference between a weight for a reference pixel other than the targetpixel and a weight for a reference pixel derived in a case where thesame region as the target region is set as the reference region is setsmall, not that the weight for the reference pixel derived in a casewhere the same region as the target region is set as the referenceregion is simply set smaller than a predetermined value. Therefore, forexample, a weight derived in a case where a pixel other than the targetpixel is set as the reference pixel may be set to a value close to 1 soas to become relatively high. By setting such a relative differencesmall, the weight derived in a case where the same region as the targetregion is set as the reference region is statistically likely.Therefore, it is possible to obtain an image which achieves both noisereduction and edge retention.

Details of the First embodiment will be described below. In the firstembodiment, in order to solve the problem, a determination is made as towhether a reference region to be processed is the same as a targetregion, and processing performed in a case where the reference region isthe same as the target region is different from processing performed ina case where the reference region is not the same as the target region.In other words, description will be given with regard to an example inwhich different types of processing are performed according to a resultof a determination as to whether or not a reference pixel which formsthe reference region is a target pixel.

A specific noise reduction processing method will be described withreference to a block diagram of FIG. 4 and a flowchart of FIG. 5. FIG. 4is a diagram illustrating an example of processing blocks of the imageprocessing apparatus. The image processing apparatus illustrated in FIG.4 includes a weight derivation method switching unit 401, a first weightderivation unit 402, a second weight derivation unit 403, and a weightedmean derivation unit 404.

The weight derivation method switching unit 401 receives inputs of pixelvalues of all reference regions and a pixel value of a target region,and performs processing for switching between weight derivation methods.

The first weight derivation unit 402 derives similarity of a referencepixel except a target pixel, and derives a weight for the referencepixel from the similarity. The first weight derivation unit 402 may beconfigured as a processing unit based on the non-local means methodwhich is generally performed. Incidentally, the first weight derivationunit 402 may have any configuration, provided that it has the functionof deriving a different weight from that derived, by the second weightderivation unit 403 to be described later.

The second weight derivation unit 403 derives a weight for the targetpixel. In other words, the second weight derivation unit 403 derives aweight for the reference pixel (or the target pixel) in a case where thetarget pixel is processed as the reference pixel. Although any methodmay be used as the weight derivation method, it is necessary that adifferent derivation method from that used by the first weightderivation unit 402 be used to derive the weight. For example, in a casewhere the target pixel is set as the reference pixel and the pixelvalues are inputted to the first weight derivation unit 402 and thesecond weight derivation unit 403, the weight derivation units derivedifferent weights. In short, the first embodiment is characterized inthat, in a case where the target pixel is set as the reference pixel,weight derivation processing is different from that for other referencepixels.

The weighted mean derivation unit 404 derives a weighted mean as thepixel value of the target pixel in accordance with Equation (1) by usingthe weights derived by the first weight derivation unit and the secondweight derivation unit.

The blocks illustrated in FIG. 4 perform processing on an input imagefor each pixel. Image data after noise reduction is obtained byperforming the processing on all pixels.

FIG. 5 is the flowchart illustrating a flow of processing by the imageprocessing apparatus illustrated in FIG. 4. The processing illustratedin FIG. 5 is implemented by the CPU 101 executing the programs stored inthe RAM 102 and thereby causing the programs to function as theprocessing units illustrated in FIG. 4.

First, at step S501, the weight derivation method switching unit 401obtains pixel information such as a pixel value of a target region,pixel values of all reference regions, and pixel positions. At stepS502, the weight derivation method switching unit 401 determines whethera region set as the reference region is the same as the target region.Here, a determination is made by determining whether the position of areference pixel which forms the reference region is the same as theposition of a target pixel. In a case where the target region and thereference region are different regions, the processing moves to stepS503. Incidentally, the determining in step S502 is not limited to thismethod. In a case where the order in which pixels are set as thereference pixel is determined, whether the target pixel is set as thereference pixel may also be determined by the order in which the pixelsare inputted as the reference pixel.

At step S503, the first weight derivation unit 402 derives similaritybetween the target region and the reference region and a weight for thereference pixel.

Meanwhile, in a case where the target region and the reference regionare the same, or equivalently, in a case where the reference pixel whichforms the reference region is the same as the target pixel, theprocessing moves to step S504. At step S504, the second weightderivation unit 403 derives a weight for the reference pixel (or thetarget pixel). Preferably, a weight in a case where the same region asthe target region is set as the reference region, or equivalently,weight which the second weight derivation unit 403 derives at step S504,is determined in the following manner. Specifically, it is preferable toset the expected value of the weight previously mentioned, or the valueof a weight corresponding to the most frequent value (N_(b)−2) or theexpected value (N_(b)) of the χ_(ij) distribution represented byEquation (4). In other words, in a case where the same region as thetarget region is set as the reference region, the weight for thereference pixel (or the target pixel itself) is too high. In a casewhere the same region as the target region is set as the referenceregion, it is therefore preferable to set the value of the weightcorresponding to the likely value of the similarity. Also, at step S504,the second weight derivation unit 403 may derive 0 as the weight for thetarget pixel. In a case where 0 is derived, the secondary effect ofeliminating noise in a case where the reference pixel bears the noise inspike form is obtained.

Incidentally, in a case where the target region and the reference regionare the same, step S504 does not set a predetermined value as the weightbut may use a derivation method such that the weight for the targetpixel, has some range. However, the above-mentioned problem is notsolved in a case where the weight for the target pixel derived at stepS504 is excessively larger than the weight for the reference pixel in acase where a pixel other than the target pixel derived at step S503 isset as the reference pixel. Desirably, the weight for the referencepixel (or, in this case, the target pixel) in a case where the targetregion and the reference region are the same is 10 or less times anexpected value of a weight in a case where a pixel having at least thesame signal component is set as the reference pixel, or preferably, avalue about 5 times the expected value is set as an upper limit. Thereason is that, even in the case of the same signal component, the pixelvalue of the target region and the pixel value of the reference regionrarely match each other due to a noise component. In short, desirably, aweight which occurs although it is an inherently rare phenomenon is setas a weight which can be statistically likely, thereby to set such avalue as to reduce a difference between the weights derived by the firstweight derivation unit 402 and the second weight derivation unit 403. Inother words, at step S504, the second weight derivation unit 403 mayderive the weight so that the weight is equal to or more than 0 and is 5or less times the value of the weight expected in a case where thepixel, value of the target region and the pixel value of the referenceregion match each other except for noise.

The derivation of the weight for the reference pixel as described aboveis performed on all reference pixels. At step S505, the weightderivation method switching unit 401 determines whether the processingof all reference pixels is completed. In a case where the weightderivation method switching unit 401 determines that the processing ofall reference pixels is completed, the processing moves to step S506. Ina case where the weight derivation method switching unit 401 determinesthat the processing of all reference pixels is not completed, the weightderivation method switching unit 401 returns to step S502.

Then, at step S506, the weighted mean derivation unit 404 derives aweighted mean based on the weights derived at step S503 and step S504,and outputs a pixel value of an output image. Incidentally, the weightedmean cannot be defined in a case where all weights are 0. In a casewhere the weight for the target pixel is set to 0, this phenomenon mayoccur; however, in this case, the weighted mean derivation unit 404outputs the pixel value of the target pixel as it is.

Finally, at step S507, the weight derivation method switching unit 401determines whether the processing of all pixels is completed. In a casewhere the weight derivation method switching unit 401 determines thatthe processing is not completed, the processing returns to step S501,while on the other hand, in a case where the weight derivation methodswitching unit 401 determines that the processing is completed, theprocessing comes to an end. An output image subjected to the noisereduction processing is obtained by a series of processing operationsdescribed above.

In the first embodiment, as described above, whether the referenceregion is the same region as the target region is determined to switchbetween processing modes, and thereby, the pixel value can be derivedwithout the value of the target pixel itself being excessively affected.As a result, a good image subjected to proper noise reduction processingcan be obtained.

Second Embodiment

Since the overall, configuration of an image processing apparatusaccording to a second embodiment is the same as that of the firstembodiment illustrated in FIG. 1, description of the same configurationwill be omitted, and description will be given below with regard todifferent portions from the first embodiment.

The first embodiment provides the approach of obtaining a good image byswitching between weight derivation processing modes, in a case wherethe same region as a target region is sec as a reference region. Thesecond embodiment provides an approach for overcoming the problem bychanging the form of a function for deriving a weight from similarity.

The problem, inherent in the conventional non-local means method iscaused by the fact that, in a case where a target pixel is set as areference pixel, a statistically extremely rare and unlikely event inwhich similarity is strictly 0 always occurs by this definition.Therefore, she form, of a function for transforming similarity into aweight as represented by Equation (2) of the first embodiment is changedto set a weight relatively smaller than that obtained by theconventional approach, in a case where the value of statisticallyunlikely similarity is obtained, and thereby, the problem can beavoided. The meaning of the term “relatively” is as already described inthe first embodiment.

In order to solve the problem, in a case where, even if similarity ishigh (or the sum of the squares of the difference is small), theprobability of actual observation of the similarity is statisticallyvery rare, a weight function such that a weight becomes small can beused. A simple weight function having such characteristics can beconsidered to be the probability itself of observation of certainsimilarity, a weight function having monotony for the probability, orthe like. It is to be noted that, even if the monotonicity between theprobability of the observation of the similarity and the weight isbroken and an inversion phenomenon occurs, the phenomenon does notbecome a large problem if its influence is slight. Therefore, the formof the function for determining the weight can be flexibly set to someextent. Also, in a case other than a case where the sum of the squaresof the difference is 0, even if a weight for similarity having asufficiently low probability of being observed is set to any value, alarge problem does not arise because the similarity is not actuallyobserved.

In the second embodiment, a minimum important property to be possessedby the weight function is that the weight in a case where the sameregion as the target region is set as the reference region is less than10 times the expected value of the weight in the case of the same signalcomponent. More preferably, the weight for the target pixel derived in acase where the same region as the target region is set as the referenceregion is about 1 to 5 times the expected value of the weight in thecase of the same signal component. Alternatively, it is also preferablethat the weight for the target pixel derived in a case where the sameregion as the target region is set as the reference region be not thesole maximum value of the weight function. If the weight in a case wherethe same region as the target region is used as the reference region isset to the above extent, the weight in a case where the value ofstatistically unlikely similarity is obtained becomes relatively smallerthan that obtained by the conventional approach, and thus, a largeproblem does non arise.

FIGS. 6A to 6C illustrate, by solid lines, examples of functions fortransforming χ_(ij) into a weight, used in the second embodiment. Also,the weight functions represented by Equation (2) in a case where h=2.5σand in a case where h=5σ are illustrated by dash-double dot lines anddash-dot lines, respectively, for comparison with the conventionalnon-local means method. Further, a probability distribution of a valueobtained by dividing χ_(ij) in a case where the signal components matcheach other by the number N_(b) of target region pixels is illustrated bydotted lines. Here, N_(b) is set equal so 25 (N_(b)=25). The horizontalaxis indicates the value obtained by dividing χ_(ij) by the number N_(b)of target region pixels, and the vertical axis indicates the weight (onthe left scale) and the value of the probability distribution (on theright scale). Vertical, broken lines are drawn at a location where thevalue of the horizontal axis is about 2.1, and the broken lines indicateshe lines on which the left side of Equation (6) is 0.001. As describedfor the first embodiment, in a case where the value of the horizontalaxis is larger than ε=0.001, this indicates that the pixel value of thetarget region and the pixel value of the reference region cannot beconsidered to match each other except for noise. Therefore, or a valuelarger than ε=0.001, a function is set so that the weight has anextremely low value.

The form of the weight function of FIG. 6A is a constant which is not 0for the time being even if χ_(ij) increases from 0, and the formcontinues until immediately before a determination is not made that thepixel value of the target region and the pixel value of the referenceregion match each other except for noise. Then, a further increase inχ_(ij) leads to the weight becoming 0 or a sufficiently smaller valuethan a value before that. In the weight functions represented byEquation (2) (in a case where h=2.5σ and in a case where h=5σ)illustrated for comparison with the conventional non-local means method,the weight is 1 in a case where the target region matches the referenceregion (or in a case where χ_(ij) is 0 in FIG. 6A). Meanwhile, in thefunction of FIG. 6A, the weight is a constant, including a case wherethe target region matches the reference region, until a value at whichthe pixel, value of the target region and the pixel value of thereference region cannot be considered to match each other except fornoise. Therefore, the weight does not become extremely high in a casewhere the target region matches the reference region.

The form of the weight function of FIG. 6B is such that a ratio betweenthe weight in a case where χ_(ij) is 0 and the weight in a case wherethe value of the probability distribution of χ_(ij)/N_(b) is high is notso high, as compared to hitherto. For example, looking at the weight ina case where the value of the probability distribution of χ_(ij)/N_(b)is high, 1.0, the weight is substantially 0 in the conventional casewhere h=2.5σ, and the weight is about 0.2 in the conventional case whereh=5σ, whereas, in the weight function of FIG. 6B, the weight is about0.6. Then, the weight has a sufficiently small value in a region wherethe pixel value of the target region and the pixel value of thereference region cannot be considered to match each other except fornoise.

The form of the weight function of FIG. 6C is such that the weight in acase where χ_(ij) is 0 is further reduced so that the weight in a casewhere χ_(ij) is 0 is equal to or less than the weight in a case wherethe value of the probability distribution of χ_(ij)/N_(b) is high (or ata location where the value of the horizontal axis is 1.0). This form ofthe function further reduces the weight for the target pixel itself andthus can easily achieve a high degree of noise reduction.

Description will be given below with regard to processing of the secondembodiment with reference to a block diagram of FIG. 7 and a flowchartof FIG. 8. FIG. 7 is a diagram illustrating an example of processingblocks of the image processing apparatus according to the secondembodiment. The image processing apparatus of FIG. 7 includes asimilarity derivation unit 701, a weight obtaining unit 702, asimilarity-weight conversion table storage unit 703, and a weighted meanderivation unit 701.

The similarity derivation unit 701 receives inputs of pixel valuescontained in all reference regions and a pixel value contained in atarget region, and outputs similarity.

The weight obtaining unit 702 derives a weight from similarity-weightconversion table stored in the similarity-weight conversion tablestorage unit 703, by using the similarity derived by the similarityderivation unit 701.

The similarity-weight conversion table storage unit 703 stores aconversion table which follows a function system in which a weight in acase where the reference region is the same region as the target regionis less than 10 times an expected value of a weight in a case where asignal component of a reference pixel is the same as a signal componentof a target pixel. Also, more preferably, the conversion table is suchthat the weight in a case where the reference region is the same regionas the target region is about 1 to 5 times the expected value of theweight in a case where the signal component of the reference pixel isthe same as the signal component of the target pixel. Alternatively,preferably, the conversion table is also such that the weight for a casewhere the reference region is the same region as the target region isnot the sole maximum value of the weight function. Specifically, thesimilarity-weight conversion table storage unit 703 stores a conversiontable corresponding to any one of the functions illustrated in FIGS. 6Ato 6C.

The weighted mean derivation unit 704 derives a weighted mean by usingthe weight outputted by the weight obtaining unit 702, and outputs apixel value of an output image.

The blocks illustrated in FIG. 7 perform processing on an input imagefor each pixel. An image after noise reduction is obtained by performingthe processing on all pixels.

FIG. 8 is the flowchart illustrating a flow of processing by the imageprocessing apparatus illustrated in FIG. 7. The processing illustratedin FIG. 8 is implemented by the CPU 101 executing the programs stored inthe RAM 102 and thereby causing the programs to function as theprocessing units illustrated in FIG. 7.

At step S801, the similarity derivation unit 701 obtains pixelinformation such as a pixel value of a pixel in a target region, pixelvalues of pixels in all reference regions, and pixel positions. At stepS802, the similarity derivation unit 701 derives similarity between thetarget region and the reference region by using the sum of the squaresof the difference as represented by Equation (3), for example.

Then, at step S803, the weight obtaining unit 702 obtains the similarityderived by the similarity derivation unit 701. Then, the weightobtaining unit 702 obtains a weight corresponding to the obtainedsimilarity from the similarity-weight conversion table storage unit 703.A similarity-weight conversion table stored in the similarity-weightconversion table storage unit 703 is a conversion table specified byeach of the functions illustrated in FIGS. 6A to 6C, for example. Theweight obtaining unit 702 obtains the weight corresponding to thesimilarity from the conversion table corresponding to any one of thefunctions illustrated in FIGS. 6A to 6C, for example. As mentionedabove, the weight obtained in this manner is derived by using a weightfunction such that the weight becomes small, in a case where, even ifthe similarity is high (or the sum of the squares of the difference issmall), the probability of actual observation of the similarity isstatistically very rare.

At step S804, the similarity derivation unit 701 determines whether anunprocessed reference pixel is present. In a case where the similarityderivation unit 701 determines that the unprocessed reference pixel ispresent, the processing returns to step S802. In a case where thesimilarity derivation unit 701 determines that the unprocessed referencepixel, is absent, the processing moves to step S805.

At step S805, the weighted mean derivation unit 704 derives a weightedmean in accordance with Equation (1), based on the weight obtained bythe weight obtaining unit 702, and outputs the weighted mean as a pixelvalue of an output image.

Finally, the similarity derivation unit 701 determines whether theprocessing of all pixels is completed; in a case where the processing isnot completed, the processing returns to step S801, while on the otherhand, in a case where the processing is completed, the processing comesto an end. An output image subjected to the noise reduction processingis obtained by a series of processing operations described above.

In the second embodiment, as described above, a good image can beobtained by using a similarity—weight conversion function such that theweight for a case where the reference region is the same region as thetarget region becomes relatively smaller than hitherto.

Third Embodiment

Since the overall configuration of an image processing apparatusaccording to a third embodiment is the same as that of the firstembodiment illustrated in FIG. 1, description of the same configurationwill be omitted, and description will be given below with regard todifferent portions from the first embodiment.

The first and second embodiments provide an example of a case where thesame region as a target region is set as one reference region. In thethird embodiment, firstly, description will be given with regard to amethod in which a reference region is set so as not to contain a targetregion. This is mathematically equivalent to a case where a weight isset to 0 in a case where the reference region is equal to the targetregion, as mentioned for the first embodiment. Therefore, if the settingof the reference region is made merely so as not to set the same regionas the target region, in a case where only a reference pixel havingquite a different signal component is present around a target pixel, aweight for all reference pixels is set to 0, and thus, calculation of aweighted mean becomes impossible. Also, in a case where all referencepixels around the target pixel have low similarity to the target pixelto the same extent, the weights for the reference pixels may be smalland about the same. In this case, even though the reference region isnot similar to the target pixel all reference pixels are added togetherin the same manner to derive the weighted mean, which in turn causes theproblem of outputting quite a different value from a signal component ofthe target pixel (or she problem of an image becoming blurred).

In the third embodiment, a portion for determining whether the targetpixel is used as the reference pixel is provided in order so address theproblem. This determining is accomplished by determining whether areference pixel having high similarity is present. It is particularlydesirable to make a determination from the viewpoint of whether areference region judged as having statistically substantially the samesignal component as the signal component of each pixel in the targetregion is present. Specifically, an examination is made as to whether areference region where the sum of the squares of the difference issmaller than a certain value is present, or whether a reference pixel inwhich a weight is larger than a certain value is present. Then, in acase where a reference region which is likely to have statisticallysubstantially the same signal component as that of the target region ispresent, the use of the reference region enables deriving a properweighted mean and thus enables determining that the target pixel is notused as the reference pixel. More detailed mention will be made of acase where the sum of the squares of the difference is used to make adetermination; in the case of the same signal component, the amountobtained by dividing the sum of the squares of the difference by doublethe noise variance follows the chi square distribution. Therefore, areject probability is set, and a threshold value at which theprobability of the same signal component is equal to or lower than thereject probability is calculated, and, in a case where the sum of thesquares of the difference is smaller than the threshold value, adetermination can be made that the signal components are the same. Evenin a case where noise does not have, a Gaussian distribution or in acase where a coefficient α_(k) of a window function depends on k, thethreshold value can be set by examining in advance a range of likelyvalues in the case of the same signal component according to thecircumstances.

Description will be given below with regard to processing of the thirdembodiment with reference to a block diagram of FIG. 9 and a flowchartof FIG. 10. FIG. 9 is a diagram illustrating an example of processingblocks of the image processing apparatus according to the thirdembodiment. The image processing apparatus illustrated in FIG. 9includes a target region setting unit 901, a reference region settingunit 902, a similarity/weight derivation unit 903, a target pixel weightcorrection unit 904, and a weighted mean derivation unit 905.

The processing units illustrated in FIG. 9 perform processing on aninput image for each pixel. An image after noise reduction is obtainedby performing the processing on all pixels.

FIG. 10 is the flowchart illustrating a flow of processing by the imageprocessing apparatus illustrated in FIG. 9. The processing illustratedin FIG. 10 is implemented by the CPU 101 executing the programs storedin the RAM 102 and thereby causing the programs to function as theprocessing units illustrated in FIG. 9.

At step S1001, first, the target region setting unit 901 sets a targetpixel and a region around the target pixel as a target region. Then, atstep S1002, the reference region setting unit 902 sets plural referencepixels to be referred to, and regions around the reference pixels, asplural reference regions. At this time, the reference region settingunit 902 sets the reference regions in such a manner that the referenceregions and the target region are not the same.

At step S1003, the similarity/weight derivation unit 903 obtains pixelinformation containing pixel values and pixel positions of the targetregion and all reference regions. Then, at step S1004, thesimilarity/weight derivation unit 903 derives similarity between thetarget region and the reference region and a weight for a referencepixel. At step S1005, the similarity/weight derivation unit 903determines whether an unprocessed reference pixel is present, and thesimilarity/weight derivation unit 903 repeats the processing of stepS1004 until the processing is finished for all reference pixels.

Then, at step S1006, the target pixel weight correction unit 904examines the weight for the reference pixel thereby to determine whethera reference region judged as having substantially the same signalcomponent as that of the target pixel is present. As mentioned above,the determination of step S1006 can be made based on whether a referenceregion where the sum of the squares of the difference is smaller than acertain value is present, or whether a reference pixel in which a weightis larger than a certain value is present. The determination of stepS1006 enables deriving a weighted mean even without the use of shetarget region as the reference region, or enables preventing theoutputting of quite a different value from the signal component of thetarget pixel. In a case where at step S1006 the target pixel weightcorrection unit 904 determines that the reference region judged ashaving substantially the same signal component as that of the targetpixel is absent, at step S1007 the target pixel weight correction unit904 sets a weight for the target pixel. In other words, although at stepS1002 the reference region is set in such a manner that the targetregion and the reference region are not the same, it is necessary to usethe target pixel as the reference pixel because the reference regionjudged as having substantially the same signal component as that of thetarget pixel is absent. Therefore, although the target pixel is used asthe reference pixel, the weight for the target pixel is set as describedor the first embodiment. For example, at step S1007, the target pixelweight correction unit 904 can use a value corresponding to astatistically likely similarity in the case of the same signalcomponent, as the weight for the target pixel.

Meanwhile, in a case where at step S1006 the weight for the referencepixel is examined and the reference region judged as havingsubstantially the same signal component as that of the target pixel ispresent, a weighted mean can be derived by using such a referenceregion, even without using the target pixel as the reference pixel.Therefore, the processing moves to step S1008 without performing stepS1007.

At step S1008, the weighted mean derivation unit 905 derives a weightedmean based on the weight obtained at step S1004, and derives theweighted mean as a pixel value of an output image. At step S1008, theweighted mean derivation unit 905 incorporates the target pixel in theweighted mean, if at step S1007 the weight is set for the target pixel.

Finally, at step S1009, the image processing apparatus determineswhether the processing of all pixels is completed; in a case where theprocessing is not completed, the processing returns to step S1001, whileon the other hand, in a case where the processing is completed, theprocessing comes to an end. An output image subjected to the noisereduction processing is obtained by a series of processing operationsdescribed above.

In the third embodiment, as described above, the reference region is setin such a manner that the reference region is not the same region as thetarget region, and thereafter, a determination is made as to whether thesame region as the target region is used as the reference regionaccording to the similarity of the reference pixel, and thereby, abetter image can be obtained than hitherto.

Fourth Embodiment

Since the overall configuration of an image processing apparatusaccording to a fourth embodiment is the same as that of the firstembodiment illustrated in FIG. 1, description of the same configurationwill be omitted, and description will be given below with regard todifferent portions from the first embodiment.

The first embodiment provides an example in which whether a referenceregion is the same as a target region is determined to switch betweenweight derivation methods. In the fourth embodiment, description will begiven with regard to a method which involves using the same weightderivation method regardless of whether the reference region and thetarget region are the same, and thereafter recalculating a weight forthe reference region which is the same as the target region. Althoughthe fourth embodiment can achieve the same effect as that of the firstembodiment, the fourth embodiment is different from the first embodimentin the order in which processing is performed.

In the fourth embodiment, a target pixel weight re-derivation unit isprovided in order to recalculate the weight for the reference regionwhich is the same region as the target region.

Description will be given below with regard to processing of the fourthembodiment with reference to a block diagram of FIG. 11 and a flowchartof FIG. 12. FIG. 11 is a diagram illustrating an example of processingblocks of the image processing apparatus according to the fourthembodiment. The image processing apparatus illustrated in FIG. 11includes a target region/reference region setting unit 1101, asimilarity/weight derivation unit 1102, a target pixel weightre-derivation unit 1103, and a weighted mean derivation unit 1104.

The processing units illustrated in FIG. 11 perform processing on aninput image for each pixel. An image after noise reduction is obtainedby performing the processing on all pixels.

FIG. 12 is the flowchart illustrating a flow of processing by the imageprocessing apparatus illustrated in FIG. 11. The processing illustratedin FIG. 12 is implemented by the CPU 101 executing the programs storedin the RAM 102 and thereby causing the programs to function as theprocessing units illustrated in FIG. 11.

At step S1201, first, the target region/reference region setting unit1101 sets a target pixel and a region around the target pixel as atarget region, and further sets plural reference pixels to be referredto, and regions around the plural reference pixels, as plural referenceregions. In the fourth embodiment, one of the reference regions is thesame region as the target region. The reference region which is the sameas the target region is set so that the reference region can be easilyidentified, for example by determining a memory which stores a value.

At step S1202, the similarity/weight derivation unit 1102 obtains pixelinformation containing pixel values and pixel positions of the targetregion and all reference regions. At step S1203, the similarity/weightderivation unit 1102 derives similarity of each reference region to thetarget region, and a weight for each reference region. Here, one of thereference regions is the target region itself. At step S1204, thesimilarity/weight derivation unit 1102 determines whether an unprocessedreference pixel is present, and the similarity/weight derivation unit1102 repeats the processing of step S1203 until the processing isfinished for all reference pixels.

Then, at step S1205, the target pixel weight re-derivation unit 1103re-derives a weight for the reference region which is the same region asthe target region. At this time, a suitable value for a weight for thetarget pixel, rather than a value which is extremely large relative toweights for other reference pixels, is derived as described for thefirst to third embodiments. For example, the weight may be replaced witha predetermined value.

At step S1206, the weighted mean derivation unit 1104 derives a weightedmean based on the weights obtained before and at step S1205, and derivesthe weighted mean as a pixel value of an output image.

Finally, at step S1207, the image processing apparatus determineswhether the processing of all pixels is completed; in a case where theprocessing is not completed, the processing returns to step S1201, whileon the other hand, in a case where the processing is completed, theprocessing comes to an end. An output image subjected to the noisereduction processing is obtained by a series of processing operationsdescribed above.

In the fourth embodiment, as described above, even if the referenceregion is the same region as the target region, a weight is derived inthe same manner, and thereafter, a weight for a reference pixel of thereference region which is the same region as the target region isre-derived. This enables avoiding the problem of a weight for a targetpixel becoming extremely heavy, and thus enables obtaining statisticallya better image than hitherto. Incidentally, in the fourth embodiment,mention is made of a weight re-derivation method; however, the sameprocessing may be performed in the process of derivation of a weightedmean. Specifically, the same effect can be achieved even with a methodin which, at the time of derivation of the weighted mean, the product ofthe pixel value of the reference pixel which is the same as the targetpixel and the weight is calculated, and thereafter, the calculated valueis re-derived as a proper value. For example, a method for re-derivingthe calculated value as she proper value may replace (or overwrite) thecalculated value with a predetermined value in consideration forrespects as described for the above-mentioned embodiments.

As described for the above embodiments, in the approach of the presentinvention, the weight in a case where she same region as the targetregion is set as the reference region is set relatively smaller thanhitherto. This enables obtaining a good image which achieves bothreduction in noise caused by the fact that the weight in a case wherethe same region as the target region is set as the reference region istoo heavy, and edge retention.

Incidentally, in the first to third embodiments, description has beengiven using consistently she sum of the squares of the difference as thesimilarity between the reference region and the target region; however,the present invention is not limited to using the sum of the squares ofthe difference to evaluate the similarity. The first and fourthembodiments can be carried out without depending on a specificsimilarity evaluation method. In the second embodiment, it is necessaryto see in advance the similarity in a case where the same region as thetarget region is set as the reference region; however, this is possibleat any time, provided that the similarity is defined, and thus, thesecond embodiment does not depend on the specific similarity evaluationmethod. In the third embodiment, the threshold value for the similarityor the weight is necessary in order to determine whether the targetpixel is used as the reference pixel; however, the third embodiment doesnot depend on the specific similarity evaluation method. Variousevaluations such as the sum of the absolute values of the difference,the product of the ratios between the pixel values, and the sum of theratios between the pixel, values can be considered as similarityevaluations other than the sum of the squares of the difference. For anyof these evaluations, theoretical calculations (including numericalcalculations by a computer) of what value is likely in a case where thesignal components match each other are always possible, and thus, thethreshold value can be determined in advance. Also, even if thethreshold value is not theoretically determined, the threshold value canbe empirically set by processing many images. Therefore, any of thefirst to fourth embodiments is not limited to using the sum of thesquares of the difference to evaluate the similarity.

Other Embodiments

Embodiments of the present invention can also be realized by a computerof a system or apparatus that reads out and executes computer executableinstructions recorded on a storage medium (e.g., non-transitorycomputer-readable storage medium) to perform the functions of one ormore of the above-described embodiment (s) of the present invention, andby a method performed by the computer of the system or apparatus by, forexample, reading out and executing the computer executable instructionsfrom the storage medium to perform the functions of one or more of theabove-described embodiment (s). The computer may comprise one or more ofa central processing unit (CPU), micro processing unit (MPU), or othercircuitry, and may include a network of separate computers or separatecomputer processors. The computer executable instructions may beprovided to the computer, for example, from a network or the storagemedium. The storage medium may include, for example, one or more of ahard disk, a random-access memory (RAM), a read only memory (ROM), astorage of distributed computing systems, an optical disk (such as acompact disc (CD), digital versatile disc (DVD) or Blu-ray Disc (BD)™),a flash memory device, a memory card, and the like.

While the present invention has been described with reference toexemplary embodiments, it is to be understood that the invention is notlimited to the disclosed exemplary embodiments. The scope of thefollowing claims is to be accorded the broadest interpretation so as toencompass all such modifications and equivalent structures andfunctions.

This application claims the benefit of Japanese Patent Application Nos.2013-026870, filed Feb. 14, 2013 and 2014-005924, Jan. 16, 2014, whichare hereby incorporated by reference herein in their entirety.

What is claimed is:
 1. An image processing apparatus for determining apixel value of a target pixel by a weighted mean of a plurality ofreference pixels in image data, comprising: a derivation unit configuredto derive a weight for each of the reference pixels, based on similaritybetween a target region associated with the target pixel and a referenceregion associated with the reference pixels; and a weighted meanprocessing unit configured to perform weighted mean processing based onpixel values of the plurality of reference pixels and the weightscorresponding to the reference pixels, respectively, derived by thederivation unit, wherein the weighted mean processing unit performs theweighted mean processing by using a pixel other than the target pixel asthe reference pixel.
 2. The image processing apparatus according toclaim 1, further comprising a setting unit configured to set a group ofreference pixels near the target pixel containing the target pixel, as areference pixel group, wherein the derivation unit derives thesimilarity by using a pixel contained in the reference pixel group setby the setting unit, as the reference pixel, wherein the weighted meanprocessing unit performs the weighted mean processing by using the pixelother than the target pixel as the reference pixel, by replacing aweight derived corresponding to the target pixel, or the product of thepixel value of the target pixel and a corresponding weight, with apredetermined value.
 3. The image processing apparatus according toclaim 1, wherein the image processing apparatus performs noise reductionon the image data by a non-local means method.
 4. The image processingapparatus according to claim 1, wherein the target region and thereference region have the same pixel arrangement.
 5. The imageprocessing apparatus according to claim 1, further comprising adetermining unit configured to determine whether a reference pixelhaving a high degree of the similarity is present, wherein, in a casewhere the determining unit determines that the reference pixel havingthe high similarity is absent, the derivation unit derives a weight forthe target pixel, and the weighted mean processing unit determines thepixel value of the target pixel according to the value of the targetpixel, the value of the reference pixel, and the weight for each pixel.6. The image processing apparatus according to claim 5, wherein thedetermining unit makes the determination based on similarity of eachreference region.
 7. An image processing apparatus comprising: anobtaining unit configured to obtain information on each pixel of atarget region associated with a target pixel, and information on eachpixel of a reference region associated with reference pixels, in imagedata; a determining unit configured to determine whether the referencepixel is the same pixel as the target pixel, from the informationobtained by the obtaining unit; a derivation unit configured to derive aweight according to similarity between the target region and thereference region according to a result determined by the determiningunit; and a decision unit configured to decide a pixel value of thetarget pixel according to the weight and a pixel value of the referencepixel.
 8. The image processing apparatus according to claim 7, wherein,in a case where the target pixel is used as the reference pixel, thederivation unit performs switching between derivation methods so as toderive a weight for the target pixel by a different method from that ina case where the target pixel and the reference pixel are not the same.9. The image processing apparatus according to claim 8, wherein, in acase where the determining unit determines that she target pixel matchesthe reference pixel, the derivation unit derives a preset value as aweight for the reference pixel as the target pixel.
 10. The imageprocessing apparatus according to claim 9, wherein the preset value isan expected value of the weight in a case where a pixel value of thetarget region and a pixel value of the reference region match each otherexcept for noise.
 11. The image processing apparatus according to claim9, wherein the preset value is equal to or more than 0 and is 5 or lesstimes the expected value of the weight in a case where the pixel valueof the target region and the pixel value of the reference region matcheach other except for noise.
 12. The image processing apparatusaccording to claim 7, wherein the derivation unit is specified so as toset small a relative difference between a weight in a case where thetarget pixel matches any one of the reference pixels and a weightderived by the following equation in a case where the target pixel doesnot match the reference pixel:$w_{ij} = {\exp\left( {- \frac{\sum\limits_{k}^{N_{b}}{\alpha_{k}\left( {I_{ik} - I_{jk}} \right)}^{2}}{h^{2}}} \right)}$where I_(ik) denotes the pixel value of kth the pixel which forms thetarget region; I_(jk) denotes the pixel value of kth pixel which formsthe jth reference region; α_(k) denotes a constant having a valuedetermined for the kth pixel of the target region; N_(b) denotes thenumber of pixels which form the target region; and h denotes a parameterfor adjusting the intensity of noise reduction.
 13. An image processingapparatus comprising: a derivation unit configured to derive a weightfor a reference pixel by using a weight function according to adifference between a pixel value of each pixel in a target regionassociated with a target pixel and a pixel value of each pixel in areference region associated with a reference pixels, in image data; anda decision unit configured to decide the pixel value of the target pixelbased on the weight and the pixel value of the reference pixel, whereinthe weight function is such that a weight in a case where the sum of thedifferences is 0 is not a sole maximum value.
 14. The image processingapparatus according to claim 13, wherein the weight function is suchthat a weight for a reference pixel which forms the reference regionwhere the pixel value of the target region and the pixel value of thereference region cannot be considered to match each other except fornoise has a sufficiently small value.
 15. An image processing apparatusfor determining a pixel value of a target pixel by a weighted mean of aplurality of reference pixels in image data, comprising: a derivationunit configured to derive a weight for each of the reference pixels,based on similarity between a target region associated with the targetpixel and a reference pixel region associated with the reference pixels;and a weighted mean processing unit configured to perform weighted meanprocessing based on pixel values of the plurality of reference pixelsand the weights corresponding to the reference pixels, respectively,derived by the derivation unit, wherein the derivation unit sets aweight corresponding to the target pixel itself by reducing the weightaccording to the similarity obtained in a case where the target pixelitself is used as the reference pixel.
 16. An image processing methodfor determining a pixel value of a target pixel by a weighted mean of aplurality of reference pixels in image data, comprising: a derivationstep of deriving a weight for each of the reference pixels, based onsimilarity between a target pixel region associated with the targetpixel and a reference pixel region associated with the reference pixels;and a weighted mean processing step of performing weighted meanprocessing based on pixel values of the plurality of reference pixelsand the weights corresponding to the reference pixels, respectively,derived by the derivation step, wherein the weighted mean processingstep performs the weighted mean processing by using a pixel other thanthe target pixel as the reference pixel.
 17. An image processing methodcomprising: an obtaining step of obtaining information on each pixel ofa target region associated with a target pixel, and information on eachpixel of a reference region associated with reference pixels, in imagedata; a determining step of determining whether the reference pixel isthe same pixel as the target pixel, from the information obtained by theobtaining step; a derivation step of deriving a weight according tosimilarity between the target region and the reference region accordingto a result determined by the determining step; and a decision step ofdeciding a pixel value of the target pixel according to the weight and apixel value of the reference pixel.
 18. An image processing methodcomprising: a derivation step of deriving a weight for a reference pixelby using a weight function according to a difference between a pixelvalue of each pixel in a target region associated with a target pixeland a pixel value of each pixel in a reference region associated withreference pixels, in image data; and a decision step of deciding thepixel value of the target pixel based on the weight and the pixel valueof the reference pixel, wherein the weight function is such that aweight in a case where the sum of the differences is 0 is not a solemaximum value.
 19. An image processing method for determining a pixelvalue of a target pixel by a weighted mean of a plurality of referencepixels in image data, comprising: a derivation step of deriving a weightfor each of the reference pixels, based on similarity between a targetregion associated with the target pixel and a reference regionassociated with the reference pixels; and a weighted mean processingstep of performing weighted mean processing based on pixel values of theplurality of reference pixels and the weights corresponding to thereference pixels, respectively, derived by the derivation step, whereinthe derivation step sets a weight corresponding to the target pixelitself by reducing the weight according to the similarity obtained in acase where the target pixel itself is used as the reference pixel.
 20. Anon-transitory computer readable storage medium storing a program whichcauses a computer to perform the image processing method according toclaim 16.